pathy-logical wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:54 am
An increase in transmission fluid temp will cause a corresponding increase in coolant temp. I monitor torque because a slipping transmission will not generate as much torque. An increase in heat under the hood will cause the intake air temperature to rise. That and/or a decrease in torque will cause a drop in horsepower. So I'm indirectly monitoring my trans temp and efficiency. Another thing you should know is long pulls up grades in a gear which doesn't allow the torque converter to lock up will generate a lot more heat as the torque converter slips.
The intake tract air is only going to get heated a trivial amount...
Neither the ECU nor your app are actually monitoring power or torque. They are calculating it based on RPM and wheel speed, and whatever else the app owner designed in if it's in your phone (which is to say it's probably only RPM and wheel speed). Even in large engines like power turbines we are almost always looking at the output of a calculated map across variables vs. measurements. There are industrial size torque meters that are in use on very large engines, but YMMV. We use other things like intake vacuum vs. expected RPM.
I think I can see MAF data in Nissan DataScan II with CONSULT II data. But to actually notice a meaningful change in MAF vs. expected RPM on the road...dunno.
Anyway, I don't think anyone has reported a transmission failure due to heat? I think the consensus across all the forums has been the air cooler has been sufficient by itself the whole time. Not a lot of failed transmission stories out there once you eliminate coolant contamination.